{"id":3106,"date":"2023-10-27T07:39:39","date_gmt":"2023-10-27T11:39:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/js1cd06kre.onrocket.site\/?p=3106"},"modified":"2023-10-27T07:41:32","modified_gmt":"2023-10-27T11:41:32","slug":"head-games","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/index.php\/2023\/10\/27\/head-games\/","title":{"rendered":"Head Games"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PhrenologyHead-1024x784.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3107\" width=\"373\" height=\"286\" srcset=\"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PhrenologyHead-1024x784.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PhrenologyHead-300x230.jpg 300w, https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PhrenologyHead-768x588.jpg 768w, https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PhrenologyHead-624x478.jpg 624w, https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PhrenologyHead.jpg 1500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 373px) 100vw, 373px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><em>To listen to today&#8217;s reflection as a podcast,&nbsp;<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/glennsreflections.us17.list-manage.com\/track\/click?u=c4927dfbefb9749e5fef1581d&amp;id=4c5229a2b3&amp;e=5cd2a880e9\">click here<\/a><br>&nbsp;<br>It was a strange interview.<br>&nbsp;<br>A young man, hoping to serve as the naturalist on the 1831 voyage of the <em>H.M.S. Beagle<\/em> as it surveyed the coastline of South America, sat before British Captain Robert FitzRoy.<br>&nbsp;<br>FitzRoy was impressed.&nbsp; This candidate seemed both bright and congenial.&nbsp; But something was wrong.&nbsp; It was the young man\u2019s nose.&nbsp; In the captain\u2019s estimation, it wasn\u2019t the nose of a real naturalist.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>Years later, FitzRoy admitted to the young man that he almost turned him away because of that facial feature.&nbsp; In the end, he decided to throw caution to the wind.&nbsp; He went ahead and invited Charles Darwin to join his crew. &nbsp;Even if we don\u2019t applaud all of Darwin\u2019s scientific or philosophical conclusions, no one doubts that he belongs in the ranks of history\u2019s greatest naturalists.<br>&nbsp;<br>So, what\u2019s the deal with his nose?&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>Darwin\u2019s nose was perfectly normal.&nbsp; But he lived during a time when a number of esteemed anatomists believed they had cracked the code of human character and behavior. &nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>All you had to do was study someone\u2019s head.<br>&nbsp;<br>Phrenologists (popularly known as \u201cbump doctors\u201d) believed they could accurately discern someone\u2019s personal strengths and weaknesses by assessing the bumps on their head.&nbsp; Over time, the human skull was painstakingly mapped to provide a guidebook for this process. &nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>Practitioners of craniometry, on the other hand, dismissed phrenologists as hopeless quacks, since they took a much more scientific approach to the measurement of skulls and brains.<br>&nbsp;<br>Today we know that both disciplines were much ado about nothing.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>Bill Bryson writes in his book <em>The Body<\/em>, \u201cNo other part of the body has received more misguided attention, or proved more resistant to scientific understanding, than the head.&nbsp; The nineteenth century in particular was something of a golden age in this respect.\u201d<br>&nbsp;<br>Believers in the discipline of <em>physiognomy<\/em> claimed that you could tell someone\u2019s level of intelligence by measuring their lips, ears, or foreheads.&nbsp; You could guess someone\u2019s future \u2013 and thus know whether they would make a good business partner, good friend, or good spouse \u2013 by examining the distance between their eyes.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>Captain FitzRoy believed there was such a thing as a \u201cnaturalist\u2019s nose.\u201d Charles Darwin apparently didn\u2019t have one.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>Dr. Barnard Davis (1801-1881), an English physician, became the world\u2019s supreme authority on the shape of the human skull.&nbsp; His private collection numbered 1,540, which Bryson points out exceeded the total number of skulls in all the world\u2019s other institutional collections combined.&nbsp; One has to wonder what trick-or-treaters might have thought when his door swung open on Halloween.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>Davis, like most of his peers, had decided in advance that the skulls of dark-skinned ethnicities would no doubt display \u201ccephalic peculiarities\u201d which indicated moral deficiencies.<br>&nbsp;<br>Such people should be treated \u201cnot as criminals but as dangerous idiots.\u201d&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>Here we should point out, with sadness and not a little anger, that most European doctors and scientists of that time were openly committed to the doctrine of their own racial superiority. &nbsp;In the strange worlds of phrenology, craniometry, and physiognomy, it was easy enough to \u201cfind\u201d whatever data they needed to support their biases.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>A century and a half of genuine scientific research has toppled the notion that people who look different must therefore be different in character and intelligence.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>But old ideas die hard.&nbsp; The odds are good that we\u2019ve all heard someone say, \u201cI knew just by looking at him that I couldn\u2019t trust him.\u201d<br>&nbsp;<br>Perhaps we have said such words ourselves.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>The search for an infallible people-sorting mechanism \u2013 a way to tell the Good from the Bad from the Safe from the Threatening \u2013 has turned into something of a quest for the Relational Holy Grail.&nbsp; Should we pay attention to skin color, noses, or bumps on the skull?&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>It should come as no surprise that Jesus had something to say about this.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>Relational discernment doesn\u2019t come down to how people look.&nbsp; And we can easily be fooled by what people say.&nbsp; The true test of someone\u2019s character is what they <em>do<\/em>.&nbsp; \u201cA good tree bears good fruit, and a bad tree bears bad fruit,\u201d he declares at the end of his Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 7:17). &nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>Here\u2019s how Eugene Peterson captures the wider context of that verse in his paraphrase called <em>The Message<\/em>:&nbsp; &nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br><em>\u201cBe wary of false preachers who smile a lot, dripping with practiced sincerity. Chances are they are out to rip you off some way or other. Don\u2019t be impressed with charisma; look for character. Who preachers&nbsp;are&nbsp;is the main thing, not what they say. A genuine leader will never exploit your emotions or your pocketbook. These diseased trees with their bad apples are going to be chopped down and burned<\/em>\u201d (Matthew 7:15-20).&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>In the tumult and chaos of our times \u2013 with every headline seeming to scream, \u201cYou should be wary and afraid of other people\u201d \u2013 how can we cultivate a healthy measure of trust?<br>&nbsp;<br>Here are two measuring sticks for character.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>If someone speaks, do they tell the truth?&nbsp; If someone makes a promise, do they actually keep it?<br>&nbsp;<br>Those are signs of good fruit that can only come from a good tree.&nbsp; We can increasingly entrust our hearts to such people.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>And if we ourselves make a practice of telling the truth and keeping our promises, others may just give their hearts to us, too.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To listen to today&#8217;s reflection as a podcast,&nbsp;click here&nbsp;It was a strange interview.&nbsp;A young man, hoping to serve as the naturalist on the 1831 voyage of the H.M.S. Beagle as it surveyed the coastline of South America, sat before British Captain Robert FitzRoy.&nbsp;FitzRoy was impressed.&nbsp; This candidate seemed both bright and congenial.&nbsp; But something was wrong.&nbsp; It was the young&#8230; <a href=\"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/index.php\/2023\/10\/27\/head-games\/\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3107,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[531],"class_list":["post-3106","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-judging"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3106","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3106"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3106\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3109,"href":"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3106\/revisions\/3109"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3106"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3106"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glennsreflections.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3106"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}